Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Quotient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 22:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neo Quotient[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A company with absolutely no indication of notability. All I could find was a few press release stories and some primary sources. Fails NCORP. M4DU7 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional article, not meeting notability or source requirements. --Micky (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the company. Definitely WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 03:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.