Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoPong Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 19:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NeoPong Software[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP, nothing in gnews, all the sources in this article are unreliable. LibStar (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Hey, they have a page on IGN, that should establish some notability. And I do agree with you the article is in bad shape and needs cleanup. That's all. Jeremjay 24 21:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. I was wrong. One of their games has an IGN page and that should make the company notable. And come on, it's a game company, they publish games, that has to be notable.Jeremjay 24 21:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CORP is the criteria not simply being a game company. LibStar (talk) 01:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I couldn't find anything in reliable sources providing any significant coverage. And no, not every game company is notable. MuZemike 20:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - publishing games, or having an IGN directory entry for a game, is not notability. Significant coverage is what's needed. Marasmusine (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is no substantial coverage about this company. This very brief IGN article is the only thing resembling coverage that I could find and it essentially says nothing other than they haven't released anything. -- Whpq (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.