Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Nazism in Thailand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Nazism in Thailand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

personal essay on the history of Thailand's relationship to Japan during WWII. Conflates neo-Nazism with Fascism. External sources are not reliable sources (one blog, the other is the Daily Mail). Coffeepusher (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is unsourced, not on the topic of the title, and so poorly written we have to guess what meaning is intended. The topics of the relationship of Thailand with Imperial Japan and of fascist-like tendencies within Thai culture and politics should be covered in more expansive articles, but neither is really about "Neo-Nazism." BayShrimp (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the nominator and the above comment. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- There is a difference between Nazism (with its genocidal tendency) and Fascism. I am sure that we need an article on the position of Thailand in WWII; perhaps we already have one. However this is not it. The alliance between Germany and Japan does not make Japan of WWII either Nazi or neo-Nazi. The alliance of Japan and Thailand cannot make Thailand neo-Nazi either. The alliances largely consisted of being at war with US and UK: there was little opportunity for mutual assistance between the European and Asian axis powers, becasue theri opponents controlls the sea. This article is all about POV-pushing. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The fact that people in Thailand relate differently towards Nazi German symbols is not Neo-Nazism. (On a side topic, there have been Western expat neo-nazis that have settled down in Thailand, but hardly notable feature enough for an article) --Soman (talk) 12:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.