Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemule Barlas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nemule Barlas[edit]

Nemule Barlas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating

Burlaki Barlas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It is unclear whether these are the correct names for these descendant of Yesunte Möngke / ancestors of Saif al-din Hajji beg, as the names do not appear in any of the sources given by the page creator. In any case, we seem to know very little about these people, and so should not have standalone articles about them, as they clearly fail our notability criteria. Delete both unless there are significant changes to the sourcing situation. —Kusma (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some previous discussion (and more alleged sources that do not contain the names) at the creator talk page: User talk:Ajrun Amir'za-da. —Kusma (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hajji Barlas father Burlaki Barlas his father Nemule Barlas his father Yesunte Möngke Barlas his father Qarachar Barlas as primary sources was Timurid Iran politics, religion, amd culture book and name came from this wiki page and also sources from this wiki check out and read now

https://ca.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajji_Barles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajrun Amir'za-da (talkcontribs) 18:55, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Catalan Wikipedia is (like all user contributed content) not a reliable source. See WP:UGC. Even if the names check out, the two people in question fail WP:BIO, as all we know about them seems to be their sons and fathers. See WP:INVALIDBIO. —Kusma (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both as completely unverifiable and thus probably a hoax (considering also that the sources provided have nothing even remotely similar in them). Fram (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s Isn’t any validation page so it wasn’t any fake history it’s frik lineages you first time know tgis name but i know before you references [[1]]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajrun Amir'za-da (talkcontribs) 09:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That book doesn't contain the names "Nemule" or "Burlaki", so how is it supposed to be a reference for the two articles up for deletion? Fram (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.