Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemexia (game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 23:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nemexia (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. The game claims to have more than 2 million players, but this is not backed up by any source. A Google search suggests some popularity, particularly in Europe, but I failed to find enough significant or reliable coverage. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- It doesn't said 2 million players, it said 2 million registrations for 5 years period but I've removed it because this is internal data and as you said there are no public sources that can back it up - C.D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonel.daniel (talkcontribs) 07:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Colonel.daniel: - Can you read Polish sources? If so I would be happy to show you how to use reliable sources to properly source articles which is the only way to ensure that they are not deleted. You can leave a note at my talk page if you like. -Thibbs (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The sources don't have to be added to the article. It's definitely a good idea, but WP:NRV only requires that they exist. It would be helpful if we could get a Polish speaker to translate the articles, though. I don't really trust machine translations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (message) @ 20:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.