Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemesis (role-playing game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nemesis (role-playing game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a commercial product has lacked independent sources of any kind for the last 12 years; the only reference in article is to product's manual. A standard BEFORE (JSTOR, newspapers.com, Google News, Google Books) fails to find anything in RS. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:PROMO violation, fails WP:NPRODUCT. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only source is WP:PRIMARY. SportingFlyer talk 07:52, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after source I added and if more can be found, otherwise merge to List of role-playing games. BOZ (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BOZ. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, one source does not constitute notability. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.