Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Villalobos Ferrer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No longer totally unreferenced and consensus seems clear that notability can be established Davewild (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nelson Villalobos Ferrer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced BLP since early 2008. I found only one source, and the guidelines require multiple ones for notability. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The Spanish language article has his name as Nelson Villalobo Ferrer, and a search for 'Nelson Villalobo' did find some potential sources, though in Spanish, so could do with a Spanish speaker to evaluate them.--Michig (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP, was a mis-spelled last name. A very notable Cuban artist. If you check google books you will see various books mentioning him.Callelinea (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep After wading through many scrambled and useless mentions on lots of websites, I did find some seemingly good solid references, mostly in Spanish. It would be good if a Spanish speaking editor could add reliable references.Cullen328 (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.