Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Still profoundly disagree about a need to have a disambig for non-notable items, but do not see any need to keep it here any longer.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson Davis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A disambig of two items none of which has (and is unlikely to have) an article. I propose to delete it, not to revert back to a redirect. Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep irrelevant whether they will ever have a page entirely about them, there is info on WP about them and we should help readers find it. 2 valid entries per MOS:DABMENTION at time of nomination, but I'm not sure if ways of improving page as it is were looked at WP:BEFORE nomination. I added Nelson H. Davis who has an article and a fictional character which meets MOS:DABMENTION. Now has 4 valid entries and is probably worth an WP:RM about the soldier being the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Ymblanter, would you consider withdrawing nomination? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work, but I would prefer more opinions. I believe the nomination is valid.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: valid dab page, and was so even at the time of nomination. PamD 12:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Valid dab now, valid dab at the time of nomination. More specifically, on the primary topic issue, I'd support a move of this page to Nelson Davis (disambiguation), a redirect of Nelson Davis to Nelson H. Davis, and the addition of a hatnote to the dabpage from that article. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perfectly good {{hndis}} page, helpful to readers. Narky Blert (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.