Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Nelson (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Author removed PROD, product doesn't seem notable, google search only shows up some advertising, the rest is about SUSE studio. by ⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 06:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a new distribution sourced to its Sourceforge page and other user-submitted sites. No evidence of notability whether by WP:NSOFT, WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG and a message on the Talk page asking "what we need to do before a certain quantity of the people are recommended to this software project" misunderstands Wikipedia to be a promotional medium. AllyD (talk) 07:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Here, not to promote, this software project is quite new and not to be expected for its tertiary sources anymore, or how can the project author help to get tertiary sources for this article thanks?202.40.211.131 (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- 202.40.211.131, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, only notable subjects go here, that's why the article is getting deleted. by ⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 07:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Outside the tertiary sources, how to know if a software project is ‘‘notable’’ thanks?202.40.211.131 (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- 202.40.211.131, I can't explain well, but This well-redacted policy can, also this one and this one. by ⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 07:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- If for some reason you or the article creator want to continue this discussion, please do so in my talk page by ⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 08:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Outside the tertiary sources, how to know if a software project is ‘‘notable’’ thanks?202.40.211.131 (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- 202.40.211.131, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, only notable subjects go here, that's why the article is getting deleted. by ⚞Lil Johnny⚟ (t·c) on 07:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Here, not to promote, this software project is quite new and not to be expected for its tertiary sources anymore, or how can the project author help to get tertiary sources for this article thanks?202.40.211.131 (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.