Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelly Leon-Chisen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Leon-Chisen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sigcov to establish notability. Search hits are either self-published or routine references to her book. Jdcooper (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Plenty of passing mentions, but no solid reliable sources with significant coverage to establish notability. SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment I found it very difficult to work out what on earth she did. Its about code and its written in code. So she is a computer programmer? a cryptologist?... no. It appears she sorts diseases and ailments into neat piles and publishes guides so that everyone is talking about the same medical detail. Valuable job. I've added a few links but it needs to be translated in to basic scientific descriptions. Delete or link all the acronyms. Victuallers (talk) 11:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, and Medicine. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like delete, but we don't really have a quorum here. Even one more !vote would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable individual, zero sourcing, The ICD codes used are what hospitals in the US use to bill patients, the disease classifications, also use for statistical purposes with the UN as I recall. She's an office person in charge of this code system it sounds like. Might have a pass at AUTHOR if reviews of the book can be found, but highly unlikely, it's too specialized. Oaktree b (talk) 20:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This doesn't show notability, but explains what we're talking about [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.