Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neill Calabro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neill Calabro[edit]

Neill Calabro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability at best, and the primary contributor to the article appears to be running a strictly promotional account for the sole purpose of promoting this author/artist/whatever and his works on Wikipedia. I'm looking for the axe here and perhaps some WP:SALT. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Currently fails GNG as all sources are routine or self-published. Calabro was not credited in the notable works mentioned here. Article is being used to direct traffic to Amazon pages for his books. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Subject lacks notability and any kind of coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 20:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.