Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Seeman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Seeman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unconvinced that either WP:BIO, WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR are met. On the BIO front, none of the sources currently used are independent, reliable and contain in depth coverage of the subject. This in National Post is the best source I could find but it's probably not enough. I don't see anything on the PROF front which would get him over the notability threshold either - this 2016 paper has 52 citations according to google scholar but judging by this search his h-index is < 10. Finally, on the author front, I can't find any substantial writing on his books. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also WP:SOAP. This article was created by a confirmed undisclosed paid editor (The Mather Group LLC). Later significant edits were by SPAs and more recently another known undisclosed paid editor. --MarioGom (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a single independent, secondary, reliable source covering this person as main subject. Does not meet general notability criteria. Spyder212 (talk) 01:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet GNG, PROF or AUTHOR. --Tataral (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.