Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neena Beber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being relisted three times, consensus seems to be to keep, but due to the "weak"ness of the !votes, it's the result is leaning towards no consensus. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neena Beber[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of a television writer, whose only stated claim of notability is writing a single episode of a television series. As always, screenwriters are not automatically eligible for articles just because they exist; reliable source coverage, supporting a claim of notability for more than just existing, must be present. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 20:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There is more than what is in the article. She is a playwrite, and "her ten-minute play Misreadings (included in Best American Short Plays, 1996-7)." Other plays are listed here although that appears to be her publisher, so not an independent source. I found her published plays and added them, plus reviews of two of her plays that were performed in New York and reviewed in the NY Times. It still may not be enough to meet WP:CREATIVE but at least now the article is a reasonable representation. LaMona (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 23:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 16:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 17:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep IMO, NYT = notable Tiptopper (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.