Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needle writing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 06:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needle writing[edit]

Needle writing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While "writing with a needle" appears to exist and does get a few hits on Google, unlike the subject of this article (which appears to be about writing on paper or other surfaces with needles), "writing with a needle" appears to merely be a form of embroidery. As for the subject of this article, I couldn't find much coverage about this practice, and Google gives so many false positives that I doubt that coverage even exists, otherwise it would have shown up quickly. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it is totally new so you all unable to read much more on this topic and about embroidery is totally different because in this pattern cotton real go through with the needle but in needle writing only needle work and words appeared..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by HannuMannu (talkcontribs) 08:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a new form of art then I'm sorry to say that it might be too soon for this to have an article here. Wikipedia's notability guidelines suggest that topics need to have had coverage in reliable sources, which right now this is lacking. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No significant coverage in evidence, and no assertion of notability in the article. I note that the article's sole source simply gives a brief blurb about some guy who needle-wrote a book. If this really is a form of embroidery, then this article's brief content might be added to Embroidery or some other appropriate article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, have found some references to needle work writing but nothing on this article's subject. Article creator states it is new form so is also likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.