Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebularium + The Restless Memoirs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nebularium. Anyone wishing to merge content, which should be sourced, can do so from the page history. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nebularium + The Restless Memoirs[edit]

Non-notable future album via WP:CRYSTAL. More reliable sources required for the existence and notability of this release. FireCrystal (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Added more sources to the page. One coming directly from a member of the band. Demon1416 (talk) 01:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It would be a good backing to have direct info from the band leader but this is considered a self-published source and those other sources are questionable at best. They're in another language and because of this their notability is unclear but if you can explain why they are notable it could be enough to satisfy the article. Also, please sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~ and take a look at wikipedia policies, especially: WP:RS and WP:V, among others. Also see the AFD discussion rules. FireCrystal (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment All of the sources are in english not another language... And I don't know how much more confirmation you need when it comes straight from the horses mouth, and just days later multiple sites start confirming the same info. Why is The Isolation Game not under questioning? The only reference it has was published months after the same band member that I am using as a reference for Nebularium + The Restless Memoirs confirmed it. That in itself states that he is reliable. Demon1416 (talk) 03:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm sorry about that. The only site I saw as non-english was this but I was too quick to judge and didn't notice it was English below (my sickness might have made things a bit stretched). I'm still not sure if the sources other than the forum were credible as sources (and forums even from the band are not reliable). These two sites should of been reviewed to see if they are just a fansite and understand who starts the headlines there. Also, like I've said above, a member of the band is a self-published source and we need more backing than that for a future album but it may be good backing with other reliable sources, such as an interview with the artist. FireCrystal (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources no reason at all to assert notability. NBeale (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Credible source added. Case closed. Next time make sure you know what you guys are talking about. Demon1416 (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment settle down and maintain civility here please. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It just so happened to be published today. Before, the sources were unclear of their notability. So now a site with an article should be meaningful at least. Another should be fair enough. P.S. since I'm sick (and getting sicker as I type), I won't be taking part in the discussion. FireCrystal (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge into parent article: Album fails WP:NSONGS. No assertion that the album has won any awards, placed on any notable charts (Italian or otherwise), or anything else. However, WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply either (at this point) because the article asserts that the album has been confirmed to be released and not just speculated. Redirect and merge at best.--It's me...Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 01:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge per Sallicio --- the sources are credible but there's no evidence of notability. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.