Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neave Barker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neave Barker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial references that do not meet GNG : his own station's page about him, a PR on his marriage, & what looks like a trivial announcement, tho a dead link. This sort of material is why we have the policy NOT DIRECTORY, DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:JOURNALIST. There are only a few trivial mentions about the subject, nothing that shows notability. Not even borderline. - Becksguy (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, lacks substantial coverage in reliable sources for a bio. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.