Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeatVision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NeatVision[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to discover how this product passes WP:GNG and our general product notability guidelines. I thought I discovered some sources that were about "NeatVision," but it turns out they were about "Neat Vision," which is not the same thing, from what I gather.

Perhaps others can show otherwise! This is part of a project do clean out some very old (uh...2006) orphans! SarahStierch (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Leaning~~ Delete - Doesn't appear to quite meet WP:GNG. I found one source (listed below), but independent coverage in multiple reliable sources are required. If additional sources are found, please ping or notify me on my talk page. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Machine Vision Algorithms in Java: Techniques and Implementation. pp. 17-19.

This source was written by the author of NeatVision so probably not WP:INDEPENDENT. ~KvnG 13:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Sure enough, upon reading the official webpage here, this does appear to be the case. I have updated my !vote to delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Tried again to find reliable sources. Failed. ~KvnG 13:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.