Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Ford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neal Ford

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable, I am having no luck finding any sources whatsoever to keep this from being unreferenced. I do believe he exists, but cannot verify any of the information with any reliable or unreliable sources. Milowent • ^talkblp-r 13:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I reluctantly find this must be deleted (as nominator) unless at least some sources can be found. Nominated as part of the Unreferenced BLP Rescue Project, which is currently sourcing all BLPs marked as unreferenced in May 2008. Our project aims to provide sourcing to all Biographies of Living Persons on wikipedia to improve the quality of the project, by attacking one month of unreferenced BLPs at a time. If you can source this article, we need you!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 13:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Milowent • ^talkblp-r 13:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Found this. According to the product description there is a chapter on him in this book, but is that one of those books made from wikipedia content? It could be. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 19:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment with respect to the Books, LLC book, yeah, their books are (in general) republications of wikipedia content. See Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Abc#Books.2C_LLC --j⚛e decker ^talk 19:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 19:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's the former leader of a recognized political party, which has been an accepted standard for keeping articles in the past. I will provide sources in the very near future (when I have the time). Sorry, I was misremembering the details of this article. I thought he was a party leader at one time, but I see (from reading the article) that he was not. I agree that this page shouldn't exist as a standalone article. CJCurrie (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any reliable sources to verify the information in the article -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. I'm finding nothing that would indicate notability. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.