Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navi (Impersonator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn per request by krian. Otherwise, GNG and NACTOR meet. (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navi (Impersonator)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 09:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 09:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Editor didn't read the article, BEFORE, and assess the sources. The refs establish notability. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn After going through all the sources in article carefully (except BBC, I skimmed), and an internet search, i thought it was a case of WP:BIO1E, and WP:DEGRADE. But after KGirlTrucker81's comment, I did a thorough (and a lot time consuming) search, and I realised this is not a case of degradability. Subject is notable. I apologise for the inconvenience. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.