Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Butt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naveed Butt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable spokesperson of a banned political party, does not meet WP:GNG. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 14:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him a Wikipedia article just because he exists — but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources (a directly affiliated human rights activist campaign and his party's own self-published website about itself) and blogs, with no evidence whatsoever of any notability-supporting reliable source coverage about him. This is not how you get a person over the notability hump. We're also not here to right great wrongs, so people are not exempted from having to have any reliable source coverage just because they were victims of a human rights violation in a country with press freedom problems — even in that situation, we still require evidence of neutral attention from sources that don't have a vested interest in the topic. Bearcat (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Party officials are not inherently notable; see WP:POLOUTCOMES. The coverage is all local. Bearian (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.