Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nautilus explorer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nautilus explorer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable and bordering on WP:SPAM. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable, and sounds like an advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadManCF (talk • contribs) 21:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - smells spammy & crufty and, in any case, article fails to establish why this vessel is notable. Eddie.willers (talk) 00:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found what appear to be mentions of this boat in travel articles in the Hong Kong Standard and the Globe and Mail, but nothing amounting to significant coverage for notability purposes. I agree the article is also pretty spammy. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this NN boat. JBsupreme (talk) 18:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even as a member of WP:Ships I can see this article is not much more than an excuse for advertising. --Brad (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.