Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nauru–United Kingdom relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nauru–United Kingdom relations[edit]

Nauru–United Kingdom relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was 15 years ago and WP has developed stronger ideas of notability since then. There is no significant coverage of these relations which previous keep votes failed to address. Any relations can be covered in British Western Pacific Territories and History of Nauru. LibStar (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as non-notable. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 23:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I can find no sources at all that would make this notable (fails GNG). We do not need a stand-alone article for every combination of countries on the planet. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.