Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Medicines Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Medicines Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indy sources; original website was just a ISP hosted website; Charity shut in 2006; no sign it was ever notable KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: they did have a full website in the beginning www.the-nms.org.uk but I guess moved to www.thenms.demon.co.uk later to save money KylieTastic (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 22:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 22:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 22:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment simply typing "Natural Medicines Society" brings up a number of mentions, including listings in 1990s book directories of pharmaceutical organisations. I'm not saying it's notable, as most of the sources only mentioned the organisation in passing, but there's sources there to sift through. SportingFlyer (talk) 23:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the same thing, I went looking for sources but could not find anything more than a minimal mention, the most notable thing I found was a mention in notes for a house of lord committee that showed two members had link to the Society as president and patron this which I've added to the article. KylieTastic (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable, and may not exist now.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 04:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.