Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Beauties
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 14:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Natural Beauties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This has been proposed for speedy deletion (twice), and prodded (once) all three of which have been declined. I see nothing notable about this book, or anything in the references to suggest any notability, and I am highly suspicious of that "one of the most popular books on Amazon.com"; while the book's Amazon page doesn't appear to give any sales rank, on the Barnes & Noble ranking it's currently ranked 393,742. – iridescent 01:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Although I was removing the speedy template, I actually support deleting this article - it isn't an A7 candidate, but there don't appear to be any reliable sources demonstrating notability. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 01:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I also removed the speedy tag, but I agree with Bart above, there just doesn't seem to be any notability. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 01:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Since no reviews are cited we have to assume the book is non-notable. Northwestgnome (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I, too, removed the speedy deletion templates, and agree with the above rationale. JNW (talk) 01:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of apparent notability. But the Foundation should buy a copy of the book for me. —SlamDiego←T 08:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Google hits only the first one as the book. Lack of notability. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm sure the "Natural Beauties" are... well... beauties and melt the snowballs on a snowman... (Fails WP:N) --Pmedema (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Everything relevant has been covered already. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.