Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nattasha Nauljam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SuckSeed. Randykitty (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nattasha Nauljam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced, short article with the most signficant information and role being SuckSeed. In the best interest of the article, it's probably better to redirect to SuckSeed to leave the door open for a future article. It seems she had one small film afterwards, Just A Second. Several news searches including with Thai (English text only) newspapers Bangkok Post, Phuket Gazette, The Nation (this one provided some results for the film but not for her) and Phuket News. There's nothing to enlarge this article and there doesn't seem to be any plans of movies and her Facebook shows mostly recent personal photos. Actress best known for one movie and seems to be living a rather normal life again. SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not finding significant coverage in reliable sources for the subject. Appears to not meet WP:BASIC for a Wikipedia article. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect as lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources, as per WP:GNG. If coverage is found and refs add to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.