Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nationalist People's Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalist People's Movement[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marginal far right group, split from National Alliance and arguably should be a footnote on that article. Lacks significant mainstream coverage, fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Netherlands. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily passes WP:NORG with significant mainstream coverage. No case for deletion or for merger to any present article. Unclear why this was nominated. gidonb (talk) 15:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. There is some coverage in reliable sources like de Volkskrant ([1], [2]), although it's somewhat routine. There is also deeper coverage in a book named Extreemrechts in Amsterdam, whose editors appear to be experts in the field. MarioGom (talk) 23:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging to National Alliance (Netherlands) could be a good option too. MarioGom (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, Keep or Merge? Other input would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject is not significantly and independently notable. The sources are simply not there. It's a short-lived, little-known, political party of the far right in The Netherlands. All we have is the standard, yearly report of the General Intelligence and Security Service about security threats, in which NVB is name-dropped 3 times in a 96-page text; a listing of NVB by the Dutch, antifascist website Kafka in a catalog of all political formations of the far right in the country; two reports about a street brawl involving the NVB (here and here); etc. The only potentially worthwhile reference might be this Trouw article but it's behind a sub wall. All to be expected since this is about a distinctly irrelevant and miniscule entity of the past. Just not enough. -The Gnome (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um... no it's not all we have. You just ignored the three references produced earlier by MarioGom.4meter4 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV per the sources provided by MarioGom and, oddly, The Gnome. Collectively these sources appear to meet our guidelines for notability.4meter4 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.