Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Star Soccer League
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
National Star Soccer League[edit]
- National Star Soccer League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod - No Evidence of Notability Codf1977 (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - teams from the league are eligible for the US national cup, therefore meeting notability guidelines at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 21:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We generally set a low bar for sports articles, and minor leagues meet general notability guidelines because the newspapers in the member cities give them regular coverage and big or small, successful or failed, they get documented later by sports historians. That doesn't necessarily carry over to individual teams within the leagues, but the NSSL would be notable enough, even if it didn't play in the national cup. Mandsford 14:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm seeing just enough coverage in reliable sources to make me comfortable with keeping this article. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.