Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Socialist Japanese Workers and Welfare Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Socialist Japanese Workers and Welfare Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This cites no secondary sources, only self-published sources and other Wikipedia articles. Unless there's evidence of significant coverage of reliable sources (which Google doesn't seem to show, at least in English), this doesn't pass the notability criteria. Spellcast (talk) 00:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article itself concedes that "It is not a significant force in Japanese politics." Lacking third party sources it appears to be just another crazy fringe party. Mangoe (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support keeping this article if somebody can verify the claims that they make on their website; most notably, claiming to have occupied the US Embassy in 1999 and raised Nazi flags there. That would put them on level with the Túpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement who occupied the Japanese embassy in Peru in 1996. I cannot read Japanese and am simply using Google Translate to navigate around their site; I can't find any evidence of the US Embassy being occupied in 1999 by them or any other group but if such information is available in Japanese, I wouldn't be able to find it. Please help if you can. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 22:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Click here for the link to that page. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 22:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a quick look in the Japan Times website doesn't show anything, not to mention that you would think that it would have appeared in US papers too. Their website hardly counts as a source. Mangoe (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sounds like a micro-party with flimsy sources and no representation or secondary sources, although I'll be happy to retract that if they can be shown to exist in Japanese. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.