Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Rebirth Alliance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
National Rebirth Alliance[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- National Rebirth Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A party that has never won a seat at an election--Not even an election for county counselors. I think this is below our usual level. DGG ( talk ) 10:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
It participated only in one parlamentary election since formation so it couldn't get a county councilor. However, like many other romanian parties that have little to non representation in public offices (exemple: Noua Dreaptă, Romanian Socialist Party), it stand out because of it's ideology. This party is the only openly Anti-abortion party in the country and also the only evangelical party. It is also related to a very controversial topic, it's founding members being part of the Coaliția pentru Familie. I just need more time to write the article and add links to it to prove it's importance. User:Barumbarumba (User talk:Barumbarumba) 15:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your reason isn't holdin up as they are many parties with no representation that have a wikipedia page here List of political parties in Romania#Parties without elected representation. And yes, some of them had representation in the past, but this party is new and didn't had the chance to win any elections. User:Barumbarumba (talk) 13:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
I also added aditional content and citations to the page. User:Barumbarumba (talk) 13:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Logs:
2021-01 ✍️ create
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The article has had additional information and sources added since this AfD began, which suggest that this party likely would be considered notable per WP:ORG. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FRINGE and WP:NPOL. At a certain point, a political movement can be so small (never gaining more than 0.5% of the vote) as to be basically a fringe idea. We need significant coverage, which I don't see yet. Also it's far to soon for an anti-abortion movement to take hold in a country where many of its citizens have lived experience of the terrible conditions of its orphanage archipelago. Bearian (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HistoricalAccountings (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.