Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Porn Sunday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 03:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National Porn Sunday[edit]

Non-notable neo-holiday, linked only from today's AfD candidate Xxxchurch. Ikkyu2 06:01, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak keep looks like it at least existed this past year, as an opportunity for fundamentalist churches to talk about their stance on pornography. I'm not sure if it's notable though, it's just not complete nonsense. Makemi 06:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 818 Google results [1] shows some impact but not sufficiently established yet to warrant an article. Capitalistroadster 06:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - existance != encyclopaedic. Not notable enough. Mention on the Xxxchurch article if that does get kept. Proto t c 12:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, see my comment at the Xxxchurch AfD discussion. JIP | Talk 12:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable holiday. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 14:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. According to the website, it is only practiced by about 80 parishes in the USA. - CorbinSimpson 20:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable pseudo-holiday.--Isotope23 20:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Royboycrashfan 21:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't all these concerned Christians be out helping the poor instead of frothing at the mouth about what goes on between a couple of "actors"? For people who are against erotic entertainment, they seem strangely captivated by it. But I digress, Delete is what I came here for. --Agamemnon2 08:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Really easy Keep for media coverage; see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xxxchurch for a partial listing. -Colin Kimbrell 20:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it and the xxxchurch it rode in on. Carlossuarez46 21:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 22:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.