Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Maritime Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National Maritime Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not only may fail WP:NORG and WP:N, but also may fail WP:V#Notability. Created probably merely to promote the organization from India (maybe without looking like an advertisement). Furthermore, users repeatedly infringed the official website, incorporating the material into the article. Searched for third-party sources substantially covering the organization, but they briefly mentioned it or never at all.

This article briefly details the organization, including its cooperation with Indian military in just two sentences in one paragraph. Preceding paragraphs briefly mentioned what the organization did for just one occasion, but that's about it. The news article was never about primarily the organization as much as about something else in the journalist's mind. George Ho (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:RS, non-notable, history is clear in copyright infringements. -- DaxServer (talk) 10:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Article has no Reliable Sources, fails WP:GNG, looks promotional. Alex-h (talk) 08:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I support the above views. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.