Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Healthcareer Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus appears to be that while the article is faulty, the organization is notable. Problems can be solved with editing, not deletion. TravellingCari 18:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Healthcareer Association

Subject to have some sort of notability, but lacks any reliable, independent sources for verification of article content Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 18:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 18:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's a healthcare certification body. The article was created just a few days ago and the nominator feels it might have some notability so per WP:AFD#Before nominating an AfD, it really ought to be tagged with {{unref}} to give it a chance for improvement instead of bringing it to AFD. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. Professional certification bodies are generally notable but I had a look for sources when first nominated but couldn't find much. I agree it needs more time. However, if it isn't sourced up in a few months I would have no problem with it coming back here. TerriersFan (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep - but needs a lot of work. It should be noted that the creator of the article is an employee of the association (I've templated him about COI). --Orange Mike | Talk 14:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Keep I am only trying to add the page for National Healthcareer Association to Wikipedia as another way for information to be found about NHA. The organization I work for recognizes the use of wikipedia at many of the schools and organizations we work with, and many schools we work with have their students research topics through wikipedia. If I am in any wrong doing, please let me know, I have edited the information on the page for National Certification in general, and have linked some internal links as well...I am not trying to make this an advertisement, I would just like to have the basic information about NHA, and National Certification for the allied health care field.--Craigbrower (talk) 19:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If you could provide links to coverage in reliable sources, it would really help the case to keep the article. For example, an article written about the association in health care trade journal or magazine would help towards establishing notability. -- Whpq (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have revised the page, and added citations and links. I do not know if they are set up correctly. Please advise what more needs to be done --Craigbrower (talk) 20:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

response to comment - I've got to undo a lot of these edits, since they user marketing-style language ("allied healthcare" rather than simply "healthcare"; inappropriate capitalization; etc.). You should study our Manual of Style. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.