Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Bolshevik Party of Spain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 11:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Bolshevik Party of Spain[edit]

National Bolshevik Party of Spain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an obscure group, which appears to fail WP:GNG. Cited sources include: [1] An article that briefly mentions it in a long list of Spanish neo-fascist groups. [2] An article about a town that its founder is from. No information is given other than the founder's name and the group's name. [3] A blog post from the group itself. [4] An article that only briefly mentions its existence and describes it as "only active on the internet". [5] A book that I can't find anywhere. Nothing in Worldcat, nothing by Googling, nothing in my local library. I'm unclear as to if it even exists. [6] An article that mentions it had vandalised some articles on Spanish Wikipedia.

I checked the Spanish Wikipedia to see if I was missing anything, and found the article on this group had been rapidly deleted in 2008.[1] So all we can really glean about this group from reliable and verifiable sources is that it was an online group that called itself a "party" and vandalised Wikipedia. As it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources, I think this clearly fails general notability guidelines and am proposing it for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.