Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NationMaster (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NationMaster[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In 2006 the AfD verict was "rewrite", well, nobody did so. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)/Wikipedia:Notability (websites) requirement. While it is occasionally cited in mass media, I don't see any articles (newspaper or scholarly), nor books, discussing it. The best I found is [1], and I don't think that suffices. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 02:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As much as NationMaster gets cited as a source in terms of various books, blog posts, etc, actual discussion about the website itself seems pretty rare. I have to pretty much agree with the arguments in the nomination. Popularity is not the same thing as notability, after all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agreed, I found results at News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary but nothing that suggests better coverage apart from passing and otherwise trivial mentions. SwisterTwister talk
Delete per nominator. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.