Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Johnson (broadcaster)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Nathaniel Johnson (broadcaster)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nathaniel Johnson (broadcaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too complicated for PROD. Yes, it's a copyvio, mostly from here and its prior versions, but given Mediasound (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)'s status as SPA, guessing it's an autobiography. It's not about the state of the article, which is a borderline G11 (Johnson initiated a revolutionary audiophile series of high-end compact discs). However if I stub it back to where it wasn't a copyvio/his CV, I'm faced with the alack of reliable sources from which to write an article. He did some work as an author, recording professional, but I cannot find anything to meet GNG or Creative guidelines even with the Grammy nomination Star Mississippi 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

• Stubify and move to draft: There is a potential article here and a draft may give someone the seed to write it. If not it'll be deleted in six months of idleness. LashandaWilhelm (talk) 20:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

delete it does not site anything. Where did this Infomation come from? --Rrmmll22 (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.