Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Ingram (karate)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 13:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Ingram (karate) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without improvement. Other than the spurt of coverage when he foiled the bank robbery in 1981, and even that is mostly simple mentions, there is not any in-depth coverage of him in independent, reliable, sources. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Delete Medium is not a reliable source and there's not enough in terms of RS coverage to support a WP:GNG pass. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and GPL93 fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The medium.com is not a reliable source. It clearly states it is for anyone to post on and does not apply any editorial limitations. In fact, it says it's for anyone who wants to create a blog. An interview in a non-reliable source does not provide any coverage towards meeting WP:GNG. There's no evidence he was the basis for the character in The Last Dragon, the only claim is he got his nickname from that character--quite a different thing. He does not meet the notability criteria for actors or martial artists. Coverage about him foiling a bank robbery is a case of WP:BLP1E. In other words, he doesn't appear to meet any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.