Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Obadia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nathalie Obadia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:BIO and serious WP:COI. Article was created by the PR/sales person (Anne-Laure Buffard Albuffard (talk · contribs)) with no other edits other than to promote Galerie Nathalie Obadia. This is one Part of a long history of Spamming and promotion by this individual on Wikipedia, see also -Spam case. Self-promotion and marketing gimmicks are NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete On one hand, this person might very well be notable. On the other hand, if this was indeed created as part of a promotional campaign (and I have very little reason to doubt the word of one of this project's most dedicated spamhunters), then this article should be blown up and rewritten from scratch to remove the taint of promotion. Articles created as part of a promotional campaign have no place on Wikipedia, no matter how good they are. Blueboy 96 17:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Danger 14:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Danger 14:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. Blow it up and start over is an interesting concept but it's not a guideline or policy. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sourcing for this person points to notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.