Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathair Sgiathach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons fey deities. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nathair Sgiathach

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft. Wikipedia is not an indidcriminate collection of information. Actually this nom is a result of fat finger syndrome, because it had occurred to me that this should be a redirect , as it was until reformed to an article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merging to list of Dungeons & Dragons fey deities would be the natural choice. If that's kept or merged somewhere, then a merge/redirect would be a good result here. If that's deleted, then this should be too. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge as per above. BOZ (talk) 15:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per J Milburn. There's not really any out of universe significance to this deity that justifies giving him a separate article. Michepman (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the proposed merge article IMHO also fails GNG, as clearly does this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if the AFD at the target list results in it being deleted, Restore Redirect if it does not. There are absolutely no reliable, secondary sources that cover this fictional deity, and it is a complete failure of the WP:GNG. The target article, if it is actually kept, already has more than enough information present already, so any additional merger is not necessary. Rorshacma (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.