Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Owens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 22:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Owens[edit]

Natasha Owens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines as outlined under the WP:MUSIC criteria. Two independent releases, one album and EP, majority of sources highlight a degree of WP:OR. Karst (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator as per Walter's point on Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources. Karst (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I know this one satisfies GNG, for her music being covered by CCM Magazine, New Release Today, and 365 Days of Inspiring Media.The Cross Bearer (talk | contribs) 03:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: notability as a Christian music artist is established by multiple reviews in independent reliable sources.--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak keep WP:BARE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.