Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Lytess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Marilyn Monroe. T. Canens (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Lytess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable individual. Few sentences of info can easily be added to Marilyn Monroe article. Quis separabit? 00:37, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She seems to have been a key person in Monroe's life. There is the allegation that they had a lesbian affair,[1], and she gets at least a chapter ("Natasha Non Grata") and lots of other mentions in J. Randy Taraborrelli's book The Secret Life of Marilyn Monroe.[2] Clarityfiend (talk) 20:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Clarityfiend also there is a source here and a mention here and a few paragraphs here. Meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully disagree. Salacious speculation does not equal notability. There is not enough for an article here. Anything/everything that is reliable/sourced about Lytess can be added to the Marilyn Monroe article, if it's not already present there. Quis separabit? 13:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We could redirect Beetle to Insect too. That a redirect is possible is insufficient reason for doing such a redirect.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. That the redirect can be made does not mean it should be. In this case the redirect should be done because it is the appropriate course of action as Lytess, her tragic untimely death notwithstanding, is insufficiently notable in her own right. Quis separabit? 02:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Salicious speculation"? Why do you think that way?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable; only has a very tenuous connection to a high profile individual. Kierzek (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Notability is not inherited, and she appears to only have any press as in regards to her relationship to Marilyn Monroe. Since there are sources, some of that info could be added to the Monroe page, but I don't believe its even notable enough to be included there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Selectively merge the sources and a short note, avoiding placing too much in there. Bearian (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Onel5969. Notability is not inherited. Me5000 (talk) 19:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Marilyn Monroe, where she is already mentioned. Not independently notable. --MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.