Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natan (footballer, born 1991)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natan (footballer, born 1991)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soccer player who played a total of 6 minutes for a 2nd tier professional team back in 2010 when he was 19. Since then he has not been in fully professional leagues. Does not have SIGCOV. Mvqr (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFOOTY as much as any player from the English football leagues through the 1900s with a solitary appearance in professional football, of which there are numerous articles. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one source is absolutely never enough to meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is plenty of consensus that says technically meeting NFOOTBALL (ie one game) is insufficient when it fails GNG so comprehensively. We afford greater leeway for pre-internet players, or players who are young, but the sole appearance was a decade ago. If sources can be found please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to argue this one too much, but I do strongly disagree with this notion of "presumed notability" afforded to pre-internet players. Would you not presume a player who has one appearance in the Brazilian second division in 2010 was more notable than a player with one appearance in the English fourth division in 1965? Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one of those ones where the clear GNG failure takes precedence over the borderline passing of NFOOTY Spiderone 12:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.