Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Payida Jabangwe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets notability standards, and no other participants have agreed with the nominator's stance of the article having a promotional tone. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Payida Jabangwe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person appears to famous for being the youngest CE of a mobile money company at that time. Sounds like BLP1E to me

Highly promotional, this reads like a resume

Non notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. When considering deletion of an exiting article, one should consider the existence of verifiable secondary sources about the subject. I have been able to find at least six secondary sources and I have cited them in the article. It is difficult to argue non-notability with that amount of coverage. The subject's age, nationality, gender, skin color etc., are facts which we all have to live with. She is notable and she deserves a stand-alone article. IMO. Fsmatovu (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per GNG. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Has generated enough secondary source coverage, as shown here [1], to meet GNG. ShoesssS ^Talk 15:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.