Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Hoover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Hoover

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Voice actress who has only had supporting roles in anime (even the ANN bolded roles such as Gargantia, Giovanni's Island, Fairy Fencer F, and Danganronpa 2 showed that even those roles were supporting/minor). The one role that she had that was starring was for a short film (Kick-Start) that only appeared once on Adult Swim as a pilot episode. And she won an amateur voice-over contest to land that role. This can be revisited when she has some more major appearances at anime conventions (she only has one so far) and there are more articles that directly cover her and her history. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only item I found to add was a brief post from Fandom Post [1], current sourcing of the article is too weak. Esw01407 (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 13:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More inclined to delete - The article is neat and at least sourced but there's not much past that and this is vulnerable to BLP issues and I even thought of draft/userfy but it seems none of the users are active enough to suggest moving to userspace. My searches found nothing aside from some browser links and even her IMDb shows there's not much. SwisterTwister talk 18:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.