Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Burn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Considering that even the "keep" opinion says that "The article currently contains nothing worth saving". But can be userfied on request if somebody wants to write a real article. Sandstein 21:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Burn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Would not pass WP:GNG Zpeopleheart (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hardly notable for a better article at this time. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant Keep. The existing article is trash, nothing more than an IMDB data dump, but a Google search easily turned up coverage of the subject, mostly of the tabloid variety (e.g. Daily Mail here and here). Seems like some of the coverage is under her Ukrainian name. The article currently contains nothing worth saving, but it's probably possible to write an encyclopedic article about the subject (though I have no intention of doing so). -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.