Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Billing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Billing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strange article about an installation artist, largely cited to adverts for her events. I can't find any news coverage about her or her events whatsoever. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems to suffer a lot of link-rot and very poor sourcing, but a Google search found: spinningdaily ima.org arthivesupdate (blog) They are not great sources but they are independent. The sources I found may not meet WP:RS though. Beakermeep^(talk) 03:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I came up with the same as User:Beakermeep; some independent sourcing that would confirm this person exists and does exhibitions, but nothing reliable or substantial enough to build a proper biography out of. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]
'Delete I also came up with the same as above, and found one book written about her, and another related to an exhibition. However, nothing that makes me cheer that she passes WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. SarahStierch (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please keep in mind that dead links can often be recovered. Links to archived copies of the dead links I was able to find in the article include [1], [2], [3] and [4]. I am not expressing an opinion on notability. --j⚛e decker ^talk 02:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.