Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Garibotto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Natalia Garibotto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Natalia Garibotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Textbook WP:BLP1E. She's an "influencer" or whatever whose only significant coverage in reliable sources is tied to the Pope's Instagram liking her photos (hilariously, apparently another incident like that happened within the past few days, came up during my BEFORE search). My BEFORE didn't turn up anything else that looks especially notable - plenty of gossip rags and low-quality sites/blogs covering "influencers," but nothing meeting SIGCOV in RS. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - Kolma8 (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete as is a non-entity, with zero notability, as are many of this user's many stub articles. Sorry, GenQuest ^"scribble" 16:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.