Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Damini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Damini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, created by her own record label (WP:COI) and relying entirely on bloggy, primary and blurbalicious "sources" without a shred of substantive reliable source coverage in sight. There's a potentially valid claim of notability being made here, but a person doesn't get past WP:NMUSIC on the assertion itself — the quality of sourcing that can be provided to verify the accuracy of the assertion is what passes or fails NMUSIC. So I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if proper sourcing can be ponied up — but in this state, it's a poorly sourced advertisement that isn't entitled to stick around. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Brief bio on MTV; not much in Brazilian news media, not much in major international news, nor much in US news, not much in music-related news (except brief MTV bio), but there are lots of images (if you click images), and then there's this YouTube video with 200,000+ listens. Video looks professionally produced, shot, high production values, she's cute, can sing and dance, meaning she's being promoted most likely, being packaged. However, sources seem insufficient to meet the WP:GNG at this point, so it looks like WP:TOOSOON but I hope she's back in Wikipedia in a few years.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.