Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasty Vlădoiu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Academic Challenger (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nasty Vlădoiu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Nasty Vlădoiu by, err, Nasty Vlădoiu! Mr. Vlădoiu, would you like to explain to us which of the WP:PROF criteria you fulfill and why? Otherwise, you know, your nice little autobiography has to go, and what a shame that would be… - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nasty seems to be a busy fellow. Many articles where he offers his opinion on xyz subject, but I can't find any that deal with him/are about him as an individual. Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nasty shouldn't be writing articles about himself, that's OR/conflict of interest. We need neutral, third party sources to prove why he's notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm not finding enough evidence to support a pass of the en-WP general notability WP:GNG or WP:NPROF guidelines. Also there is the WP:COI/WP:AUTOBIO matter. His H-index score is only 3, so he's not going to pass PROF on that. It is interesting to note that there is not an article in Romanian WP. To the creator: Nasty Vlădoiu, English Wikipedia (en-WP) strongly advises against creating an autobiography. Notability is established by what unconnected sources say about you. It is not enough to have written and published your own work, what is needed to pass our notability requirements is to have substantial coverage WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable secondary or tertiary sources: in other words things that others have written about you or your work. If you want to write about yourself to present yourself to the world, it's better to use LinkedIn, a social networking site, to or start a personal website (or ask your university to make one for you) than to created an encyclopedia article about yourself. If substantial independent sources are found, or if the awards prove to be notable you may place that on the article talk page or here for consideration, however because of your conflict of interest, you should stop editing the article directly. Netherzone (talk) 17:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An H-index of 3 is not notable, at all. Oaktree b (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Mr. Vlădoiu has changed the name of the article to Vlădoiu Nasty- Marian. Netherzone (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, and Romania. Netherzone (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPROF, fails WP:GNG, is WP:ADMASQ and WP:NOTWEBHOST 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Per all the policies quoted above, and also the bit about the h-index being equal to 3. Nuff said. Turgidson (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd advise against a speedy delete. I think it is easier to contest a CSD carried by an admin than an AFD consensus decision to "Delete". Let this discussion play out for a week. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I had not thought of that. Thanks for the explanation, I'll keep that in mind in the future. Turgidson (talk) 11:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.