Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nash salad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nash salad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this is a notable salad. Google search comes up with this article and then pages of irrelevant results. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 21:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment Notable-- salad? Dloh cierekim 21:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is what I get for not gripping the salad fork by the handle and digging in when I had the chance. Dloh cierekim 21:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I failed to find significant coverage earlier, shortly after creation. Searching on the foodnetwork and the cookingchannel website was fruitless, and goat cheese-less as well. Would appreciate feedback on how to best serve this article, but I looked for sources and came away hungry. Bon appetite! Dloh cierekim 21:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge It sounds like a lovely salad. My wife has been making something like it for years; however we were unaware of this iteration or name. But WP:RS and WP:Notable seem to be completely absent. At least on the web. I was unable to uncover anything that documented the source of the name, even. Maybe it could be "tossed" into another article. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly there are notable salads. E.g., Waldorf salad; Greek salad. So one should not pooh pooh the notion of an article. It would be unhygenic to do it in the salad. {:>})> 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm beginning to think that this AfD is in danger of becoming a joke. Lettuce be serious, okay? ... discospinster _talk 01:55, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
comment Anyway, not aware of a food-related notability guideline, so must rely on general notability guideline. Unable to locate reliable 3rd party sources with verifiable information offering significant coverage. But will consider any new information if presented. Dloh cierekim 02:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I couldn't find any proof of notability regarding this healthy submission. I'd also like to point out that the author made some negative comments on nominator's page shortly after this article was submitted to AfD. Ezhuks (talk) 12:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. A relatively recent (Dec 2010 is claimed in the article), this salad has not attracted the notice needed to establish that a Wikpedia article is justified. -- Whpq (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.