Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nascar Racer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Nascar Racer

Nascar Racer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This game has no evidence of being notable. A Google search turns up no reliable sources that establish notability, only one "this could be a good Christmas gift" listing in U.S. News & World Report, and that's it - no full reviews, no "this broke ground", nothing. Fails WP:GNG. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete per Bushranger - one of the WP:RUNOFTHEMILL handheld games of the era. Ansh666 00:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per GNG. No prejudice against recreation if verification and reliable sources are produced later. Royalbroil 01:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - Looks like another cookie-cutter handheld game. WP:COOKIE. ZappaOMati 03:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep and improve - No product page, no information, the only way is that Wikipedia meets all of the information, and will not get lost in oblivion forever, and so one day, no one knows about or that liquid crystals could do things with them. I know that is not a big game, not even good, but a user may need to know before buying or using it.
  • How many batteries need
    
  • Type AA or AAA batteries
    
  • It sounded good (will insert link to video)
    
  • How many versions are
    
  • The manufacturer that other items made
    
  • Where are the batteries (not obvious, like a screw disarmament)
    
  • Where to find the missing Manual
    
  • Basic Manual
    
  • All reviews, the we have to do ourselves, with the game in hand (I have it)
    
  • Others
    

If the problem is the storage capacity wikipedia or lack of funds then it is another matter I think wikipedia relevance criteria are wrong, should be disposal all without discussions unless it is immoral, in a paper encyclopedia this would be correct, but not in wikipedia, there is enough space (or am I wrong?) --Luis46coco (talk) 05:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

All those things you list as things to incude are things Wikipedia is not intended to incllude. Wikipedia is not a game guide, manual, how-to resource, or a source for reviews; in short, WP:NOTBLOG, which would be the place for the kind of things you want to add. Wikipedia covers things that are established to be notable through third-party reliable sources; while the notability standards are, IMHO, too tight, there must be sources to establish notability, period, and for this, there are none - we don't have an article just because somebody might find it useful. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.